As any significant prize-giving event draws close, there’s always an outcry for introducing additional classifications to acknowledge unsung work and delight the passions of fans with niche passions.
Another commentator previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, which is someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize because like all blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case for why my demand is the most urgent and significant. This is the request: There should be an award type for logic-based games.
Organizing Gaming Categories
Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; it remains highly personal, and inevitably start arguments concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason cinema institutions avoid this approach. But it is a necessary evil for the industry of gaming, showing incredible range they hardly constitute as a single art form.
For comprehensive acknowledgment of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.
Present Award Structure
The major gaming awards offer these award types recognizing Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these classifications effectively encompass many game types, allowing placement accommodating various experiences.
This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Think about these this year’s best games, all very different: structural challenges in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.
Acknowledgment Issues
There are dozens outstanding logic titles published annually without proper recognition at major award shows, if they accidentally match for categories like Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.
- An iconic brain-teaser got overlooked for anything during that awards season
- Another creative title received no nominations during that ceremony
- Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment that year
- Only a few logic titles scraped into small studio or handheld classifications
Value of Brain-Teasers
These are often compact experiences, however the design behind logic titles is of massive significance. Famous handheld logic titles count as the most-played games worldwide maintaining this status for many years.
The iconic tile-matching title challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of most purchased experience; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.
The Solution and Justification
Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. You could fill multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, given the need to exclude many worthy titles.
And to reiterate, these are games lacking appropriate categories in important events. Logic title developers function at the demanding boundary game development, producing among essential manifestations of the video game form. Just like film action specialists, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay generations.
